故事
从零开始动起来,不去健身房也能练
从完全不动开始,几乎任何活动都算数。这里讲很短的运动为什么有用、在家怎么练力量、不看心率怎么判断够不够累,以及何时该停。
最后更新:
先读这一段 身体只为超出日常要求的事做适应,所以从完全不动开始,几乎任何活动都算数。
科普内容,不替代医师诊断或处方;有症状或在服药请咨询医师。
故事路径
第 1 章
从零开始,几乎都算数
From zero, almost anything counts
身体只为超出日常要求的事做适应,所以从完全不动开始,几乎任何活动都算数。 肌肉和心肺长成什么样,取决于你最近经常让它们做什么。一天只在椅子、车和床之间移动,那么快走一段、爬几层楼,对它们已经是新的要求,身体会把肌肉收血糖的能力、心肺送氧的能力往上调(见 渐进超负荷)。
这一篇写给现在几乎不运动、没有健身房、时间少、对自己没信心的人。WHO 2020 指南的说法是:动一点比不动好,多短的一段都算进总量。每周推荐多少、多出来的好处怎么变少,见 保持健康和追求表现是两种训练。
今天可以开始的一步:挑一件每天都做的事,让它稍微费力一点,比如用走楼梯代替坐电梯。
有已知心脏病,或用力时出现过胸痛、不明气短或晕厥,先找医生评估再开始。运动中胸痛、胸闷或晕倒,先停下,立即拨打急救电话,详见怎么加量,什么时候该停一章。
这一篇写给现在几乎不运动、没有健身房、时间少、对自己没信心的人。WHO 2020 指南的说法是:动一点比不动好,多短的一段都算进总量。每周推荐多少、多出来的好处怎么变少,见 保持健康和追求表现是两种训练。
今天可以开始的一步:挑一件每天都做的事,让它稍微费力一点,比如用走楼梯代替坐电梯。
有已知心脏病,或用力时出现过胸痛、不明气短或晕厥,先找医生评估再开始。运动中胸痛、胸闷或晕倒,先停下,立即拨打急救电话,详见怎么加量,什么时候该停一章。
机制 · 起点越低为什么收获越大
美国运动医学会(ACSM)2011 年的立场声明把这件事写成了训练原则:要提高和维持体能,运动必须超出日常生活本来的活动;运动方案要按一个人平时的活动量、身体功能、健康状况和对运动的反应来调整。同样一段快走,对天天跑步的人几乎算不上刺激,对久坐的人却已经超出了日常。身体只对略超当前水平的要求做适应,这就是渐进超负荷(见 渐进超负荷)。按机制推,起点越低,超出日常的门槛也越低,所以最开始的那一点运动最划算;这一步是推论,没有试验专门按起点比较过。人群数据从另一个方向说了同一件事,但只能当背景:Arem 2015 汇总了 6 项前瞻队列、661,137 名成年人,运动量还不到推荐下限的人,死亡风险也比完全不运动的人低 20%。这是观察到的关联,不能证明是运动造成的。
ACSM 还写道:做不到推荐量、或不愿意做那么多的成年人,做少于推荐量的运动仍然能获益。WHO 2020 指南也把多短的一段都算进了总量。
所以对零起点的人,要问的不是做到多少才有用,而是先让身体每天碰到一点超出日常的要求,再慢慢往上加。
第 2 章
每天只有十几分钟有没有用
Is a short daily session worth it?
有用。很多好处来自每一次运动本身,而不是凑够一整段时间。 肌肉一收缩,就把运送葡萄糖的通道 挪到细胞表面,不靠胰岛素也能把血糖收进来,这个效应在运动后还能维持几个小时;一次耐力运动后,血压最长约 22 小时偏低。这些变化不问那天练了多久,只问肌肉有没有真的用上力。
把运动拆成几小段,效果也差不多:一项汇总 19 项研究的 发现,总时长和强度相同时,一次做完和分几次做完,对心肺体能和血压的作用没有差别。
所以下班到家已经很晚、只剩一小段时间,照样值得动。如果一周加起来还没到 WHO 推荐的范围,它仍然算数,只是收益比做足的人少一些。今天可以开始的一步:把这段时间用在让你有点喘、但还能说话的活动上,比如快走或爬楼梯,而不是慢悠悠地散步。
把运动拆成几小段,效果也差不多:一项汇总 19 项研究的 发现,总时长和强度相同时,一次做完和分几次做完,对心肺体能和血压的作用没有差别。
所以下班到家已经很晚、只剩一小段时间,照样值得动。如果一周加起来还没到 WHO 推荐的范围,它仍然算数,只是收益比做足的人少一些。今天可以开始的一步:把这段时间用在让你有点喘、但还能说话的活动上,比如快走或爬楼梯,而不是慢悠悠地散步。
证据 · 爬几层楼能练出什么
加拿大的一组研究把爬楼梯做成了最省时间的练法。Allison 2017 让久坐的年轻女性每次全力连续爬楼 20 秒、做 3 轮,每周 3 天,6 周后(身体每分钟最多能用掉多少氧,衡量心肺体能)提高了 12%;改成每轮上下一层楼 60 秒,也提高了 7%。这两段训练没有另设对照组。Jenkins 2019 做了随机对照:久坐的年轻人每天分 3 次、每次用力爬完 3 层楼(60 级台阶),每次之间隔 1 到 4 小时,每周 3 天,6 周后最大摄氧量高于不练的对照组;作者也写明,绝对增幅不大。戴腕表的大型观察研究给了另一个角度。Stamatakis 2022 在英国生物样本库里找了 25,241 名平时不做任何运动的人(平均 61.8 岁),记录他们日常生活里那些一两分钟的剧烈片段,不是专门去运动。一天有 3 段这样的片段的人,全因和癌症死亡风险比一段都没有的人低 38%–40%。这是观察到的关联,不能证明是这几分钟造成的:身体本来更好的人,也更可能有这些片段。
合起来读准边界:短而用力的运动能提高久坐者的心肺体能,这一点有小型试验支持,但受试者多是年轻人,试验只做了 6 周;它对长期健康的作用,目前只有观察性证据。
jenkins-2019-stair-snacksstamatakis-2022-vilpa-mortality
实操 · 整天坐着的人怎么插进去
每天要坐十个小时的人,除了下班后那一小段,还可以把动作插进坐着的时间里。机制在久坐办公族那一篇(见 久坐办公族):要紧的是连续坐着不动的时长。一项小型随机交叉试验里,超重的成年人每坐 20 分钟就起来走 2 分钟,餐后血糖反应下降约 24%。美国运动医学会的立场声明也写道,在久坐之间穿插频繁的短时间站立和活动,有健康好处,平时就运动的人也一样。脖子和肩膀僵是另一回事,靠的不是多走几步。对慢性颈痛,颈部、肩胛和上肢的力量训练加上拉伸,能带来中等程度的缓解,这些练习不需要器械,具体怎么练见 颈痛。
这样,不去健身房的部分就有三块:下班后一小段让你有点喘的活动,坐着时频繁起身,以及针对脖子和肩膀的练习。
dunstan-2012-sitting-breaksgross-2015-cochrane-neck-exercise
第 3 章
在家练力量,不用器械
Strength at home, no equipment
肌肉长不长,看的是它有没有被练到接近做不动,而不是用了什么器械。 一篇综述总结说,从较轻到很重的负荷,只要每组做到接近力竭,肌肉的增长大致相当;负荷轻重主要影响最大力量。自己的体重就是负荷,换个姿势就能调轻调重。
一项小型随机试验里,年轻男性做跪姿等调整过的俯卧撑,负荷和卧推相当,8 周后力量和胸部、上臂后侧的肌肉厚度,和卧推组增长得差不多。
在家能用的动作很多,下面只是机制的例子:从椅子上站起再坐下,练大腿和臀部;扶墙或跪姿俯卧撑,练胸、肩和上臂后侧;踏上台阶再下来,练单腿。今天可以开始的一步:挑一个动作,做到最后几下明显吃力为止。WHO 2020 指南建议成年人每周 2 天以上做练到全身主要肌群的力量训练;怎么排动作、怎么进阶,见 力量训练入门。
一项小型随机试验里,年轻男性做跪姿等调整过的俯卧撑,负荷和卧推相当,8 周后力量和胸部、上臂后侧的肌肉厚度,和卧推组增长得差不多。
在家能用的动作很多,下面只是机制的例子:从椅子上站起再坐下,练大腿和臀部;扶墙或跪姿俯卧撑,练胸、肩和上臂后侧;踏上台阶再下来,练单腿。今天可以开始的一步:挑一个动作,做到最后几下明显吃力为止。WHO 2020 指南建议成年人每周 2 天以上做练到全身主要肌群的力量训练;怎么排动作、怎么进阶,见 力量训练入门。
证据 · 自重训练和器械比怎么样
两项小型随机试验直接拿俯卧撑和卧推比。Kikuchi 2017 把 18 名年轻男性分成两组:一组卧推,用最大重量的 40%;另一组做俯卧撑,用跪姿等姿势把负荷调到同样水平,每周 2 次,共 8 周。两组的卧推最大重量、胸大肌和肱三头肌厚度都增加了;只有肱二头肌厚度是卧推组才增加。Kotarsky 2018 让 23 名有一定训练基础的男性做逐级加难的俯卧撑,或者做卧推,每周 3 次,4 周后两组的卧推最大重量都明显上升,肌肉厚度在 4 周里没测出变化。读准边界:两项研究都很小,受试者都是年轻男性,时间只有 4 到 8 周,测的也只有上半身。它们说明的是自重动作只要负荷够、又逐步加难,就能练出力量,不是说自重训练在任何人身上都等同于器械。
下肢按同一个机制推:从椅子上站起来、踏台阶,负荷就是自己的体重;这些动作变轻松以后,要换更难的版本,比如下蹲放慢、改成单腿,才能继续超出日常。逐级加难的几种办法见 渐进超负荷。
kotarsky-2018-pushup-progression
第 4 章
撸铁和跑步只能选一样时
Lifting or running, if only one
两样练到的东西不一样,指南要的是两样都有;真要先挑一样,就挑你更缺、也更能坚持的那一样。 肌肉按刺激决定造哪种蛋白:长时间耐力训练让它多造线粒体,有氧能力上去;大重量力量训练让它多造收缩蛋白,肌肉和最大力量上去(见 保持健康和追求表现是两种训练)。跑步练不出多少力量,撸铁也代替不了有氧。
到了中年,力量这一块更不该省:肌肉量和肌肉功能会随年龄流失,生活方式从年轻时起就在影响它,力量训练是目前对抗它的主要办法(见 肌少症)。
今天可以开始的一步:如果你上楼就喘,先从让你有点喘的活动开始;如果走路还行,但提重物、从矮凳上站起来越来越吃力,先把力量捡起来。两样都可以在家开始。
到了中年,力量这一块更不该省:肌肉量和肌肉功能会随年龄流失,生活方式从年轻时起就在影响它,力量训练是目前对抗它的主要办法(见 肌少症)。
今天可以开始的一步:如果你上楼就喘,先从让你有点喘的活动开始;如果走路还行,但提重物、从矮凳上站起来越来越吃力,先把力量捡起来。两样都可以在家开始。
证据 · 两样都做的人风险更低吗
Momma 2022 汇总了 16 项队列研究,受试者是没有严重疾病的成年人:在考虑有氧运动之后,做力量训练的人,全因死亡、心血管病、癌症和糖尿病的风险低 10%–17%;力量训练加有氧的人,全因、心血管病和癌症死亡风险也更低。关联最明显的力量训练量大约是每周 30 到 60 分钟,作者也写明,更大训练量的影响还不清楚。这些都是观察到的关联,做力量训练的人也可能本来就更健康。WHO 2020 指南给成年人的建议本来就是两样都有:有氧,加每周 2 天以上练到全身主要肌群的力量训练。它同时写明,没有证据说明力量训练做得更多,健康收益就更大。
所以 45 岁时撸铁还是跑步,与其说是二选一,不如说是先后:先补你更缺的那一样,等它成了习惯,再把另一样加进来。
第 5 章
不看心率,怎么知道够不够累
How hard is enough, without a monitor
最方便的强度表是你的呼吸。 运动强度越过一个门槛(叫通气阈或乳酸阈)之后,呼吸会明显加深加快,舒服地说完整的句子就做不到了。所以说话测试很好用:还能比较舒服地一句句说话,强度在门槛以下;说话开始断断续续、说着难受,就接近或越过了门槛。一篇综述总结说,健康人和心血管病人都是这样,走路、慢跑、骑车、爬楼也都一样。
另一种办法是给自己的用力程度打分,叫主观用力感(RPE)。常用的 Borg 量表从 6 分到 20 分,分数越高越费力;一项 2,560 人的测试里,这个分数和心率、血乳酸都高度相关。
今天可以开始的一步:运动时试着说一句完整的话,能说完、但有点喘,就是适合起步的强度。按年龄算出来的心率范围,放到某一个人身上可能差得很远,所以这里不给。
另一种办法是给自己的用力程度打分,叫主观用力感(RPE)。常用的 Borg 量表从 6 分到 20 分,分数越高越费力;一项 2,560 人的测试里,这个分数和心率、血乳酸都高度相关。
今天可以开始的一步:运动时试着说一句完整的话,能说完、但有点喘,就是适合起步的强度。按年龄算出来的心率范围,放到某一个人身上可能差得很远,所以这里不给。
证据 · 说话测试和用力感靠得住吗
Reed 2014 的综述汇总了说话测试的研究:在健康成年人和心血管病人身上,强度低于通气阈或乳酸阈时,大多还能舒服地说话;超过这个阈值,就说不舒服了。它在走路、慢跑、骑车、椭圆机和踏步机上都表现一致。作者认为,它对运动员、健康成人和心血管病人都是可靠、实用又不花钱的强度工具,但不太适合用来把握。主观用力感的证据来自一项大样本测试。Scherr 2013 让 2,560 人在跑台或功率车上逐级加量,每一级同时测心率、血乳酸和 Borg 评分(6 到 20 分)。评分和心率、血乳酸都高度相关(相关系数 0.74 和 0.83);平均来说,乳酸阈对应约 10.8 分,个体无氧阈对应约 13.6 分;性别、年龄、有没有冠心病、平时运动多少,都没有明显改变这种对应。作者建议训练较少的人在 11 到 13 分练,想练得更狠、又仍以有氧为主时用 13 到 15 分。
这两样工具读的都是身体此刻的反应,不是一个按人群平均算出来的数字。
误区 · 为什么不按年龄算心率
很多 App 和器械会用 220 减年龄算出一个最大心率,再乘一个百分比当你的目标。问题出在第一步:这个公式当初并不是从一项专门的研究里算出来的,任何一个人的真实最大心率,都可能比它高或低每分钟 12 次左右,甚至更多。Tanaka 2001 汇总了 351 项研究、18,712 人,重新回归出 208 减 0.7 乘年龄,并指出旧公式在老年人身上偏低;但新公式也只是平均值,放到某一个人身上,误差依旧在。起点偏了,乘出来的目标区间也跟着偏。所以本站不替个人给心率百分比;想用心率,最准的是在医院的心肺运动试验里实测(见 VO2max)。对刚起步的人,说话测试和用力评分已经够用。按机制推,它们还会跟着你的进步自动调整:体能上来之后,同样说得出话的速度会变快。
robergs-2002-max-hr-critique
第 6 章
怎么加量,什么时候该停
Adding more, and when to stop
先记住什么时候必须停。 运动中或运动后突发胸痛、胸闷,或在运动中晕倒,立即拨打急救电话。运动中出现明显气短、心慌或快要晕倒,立刻停下,不要硬撑;症状不退,立即就医。有已知心脏病,或用力时出现过胸痛、不明气短或晕厥,先找医生评估再开始。
除此之外,加量是一件慢事。身体适应了原来的要求,原来的要求就不再超出日常,这时再往上加一点:每组多做几下、组数加上去、动作放慢、换更难的姿势,或者楼梯多爬一段。一次只动一样,动了之后先看身体怎么回应,再动下一样(见 渐进超负荷)。
换了新动作后,肌肉过一两天才酸、几天内退掉,是正常的(见 延迟性酸痛 (DOMS));锐痛、定点痛、越练越重的痛,先停下来(见 训练常见伤)。
除此之外,加量是一件慢事。身体适应了原来的要求,原来的要求就不再超出日常,这时再往上加一点:每组多做几下、组数加上去、动作放慢、换更难的姿势,或者楼梯多爬一段。一次只动一样,动了之后先看身体怎么回应,再动下一样(见 渐进超负荷)。
换了新动作后,肌肉过一两天才酸、几天内退掉,是正常的(见 延迟性酸痛 (DOMS));锐痛、定点痛、越练越重的痛,先停下来(见 训练常见伤)。
实操 · 怎么加、看什么、多久复盘
加量没有一个对所有人都成立的百分比。一项 532 名新手跑者的随机试验里,按每周加量不超过 10% 设计的 13 周计划,受伤率和普通的 8 周计划差不多(20.8% 对 20.3%)。能留下来的是原则:美国运动医学会的立场声明写道,按一个人平时的活动量、健康状况和对运动的反应来调整方案,强度和量逐步往上加,可以降低运动的风险。教练常用的一种办法叫双重渐进:先在同一个难度上把次数做多,做到比目标多几下时,再换更难的版本,次数回到少的那一端。美国运动医学会的力量训练进阶框架也是这个思路:逐步增加负荷、训练量或频率。
观察什么:同一段楼梯爬完没那么喘了,同样的速度说话更轻松了,同样次数的起立或俯卧撑做得更利索了。这些变化要几周才测得出来,爬楼和俯卧撑的那几项试验做的是 4 到 8 周,所以复盘按周算,不按天算。生病、累了或睡得少时,方案跟着往下调,这也是按健康状况调整的一部分。
buist-2008-graded-training-rctjenkins-2019-stair-snackskotarsky-2018-pushup-progression
红旗 · 哪些信号要立刻停下就医
下面这些不是练得不够,也不是普通的酸痛,而是要立即处理的信号。本站不诊断,出现时先停下来。运动中或运动后突发胸痛、胸闷,像被压住或攥紧,可能放射到手臂、脖子或下颌,伴气短、出冷汗:可能是心脏急症,立即拨打急救电话。在运动中晕倒:立即拨打急救电话。平时晕倒过一次,也要找医生查原因。运动中出现明显气短、心慌或快要晕倒:立刻停下,不要硬撑;症状不退,立即就医。疼痛和肿胀远远超出这次的训练量、肌肉无力到动不了,尤其是尿色变成可乐色或酱油色:可能是横纹肌溶解,要立即去急诊。不习惯的运动一下子练得太猛,是它的诱因之一。
有已知心脏病,或用力时出现过胸痛、不明气短或晕厥,先找医生评估再开始。美国运动医学会的运动前筛查共识写道,运动相关的心血管事件常常先有预警症状,而人越常运动、体能越好,运动带来的心血管风险就越低;它判断要不要先看医生,看的是三件事:你现在动得多不多,有没有症状或已知的心血管、代谢、肾脏疾病,以及打算练多狠。
rawson-2017-exertional-rhabdomyolysisbacker-2023-exertional-rhabdomyolysis
参考文献 · 20
- Garber, C. E., Blissmer, B., Deschenes, M. R., et al. (2011). Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 43(7), 1334-1359. ACSM recommends both aerobic (150 min/week moderate) and resistance (2x/week) training for all adults; concurrent training benefits for general health far exceed interference costs for non-elite individuals. Abstract (PMID 21694556): a program of regular exercise 'beyond activities of daily living to improve and maintain physical fitness and health is essential for most adults'; 'The exercise program should be modified according to an individual's habitual physical activity, physical function, health status, exercise responses, and stated goals. Adults who are unable or unwilling to meet the exercise targets outlined here still can benefit from engaging in amounts of exercise less than recommended.' 'Educating adults about and screening for signs and symptoms of CHD and gradual progression of exercise intensity and volume may reduce the risks of exercise.' 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb
- American College of Sports Medicine. (2009). Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(3), 687-708. ACSM position stand: progressive overload through gradual increases in load, volume, or frequency; periodization optimizes long-term adaptation. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670
- Richter, E. A., & Hargreaves, M. (2013). Exercise, GLUT4, and skeletal muscle glucose uptake. Physiological Reviews, 93(3), 993-1017. Muscle contraction activates AMPK which translocates GLUT4 to the sarcolemma independently of insulin; this effect persists for hours post-exercise. 10.1152/physrev.00038.2012
- Allison, M. K., Baglole, J. H., Martin, B. J., Macinnis, M. J., Gurd, B. J., & Gibala, M. J. (2017). Brief intense stair climbing improves cardiorespiratory fitness. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 49(2), 298-307. Two studies in 31 sedentary women (age 24 ± 10 years); the training phases had no separate control group. Performing 3 × 20-s 'all-out' bouts of continuous stair climbing 3 days a week for 6 weeks raised peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) by 12%, about 1 MET (n = 12); 3 × 60-s bouts of climbing and descending one flight of stairs, 3 days a week for 6 weeks, raised it by 7%. Heart rate and perceived exertion during the stair protocols were similar to an all-out cycling protocol. Conclusion: 'Brief, intense stair climbing is a practical, time-efficient strategy to improve CRF in previously untrained women' (abstract, PMID 28009784). 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001188
- Bull, F. C., Al-Ansari, S. S., Biddle, S., Borodulin, K., Buman, M. P., Cardon, G., et al. (2020). World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(24), 1451-1462. 'All adults should undertake 150-300 min of moderate-intensity, or 75-150 min of vigorous-intensity physical activity, or some equivalent combination of moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity, per week'; the guidelines recommend regular muscle-strengthening activity for all age groups. Conclusion: 'They reaffirm messages that some physical activity is better than none, that more physical activity is better for optimal health outcomes and provide a new recommendation on reducing sedentary behaviours.' Full text (PMC7719906): adults should also do muscle-strengthening activities at moderate or greater intensity involving all major muscle groups on 2 or more days a week (strong recommendation, moderate-certainty evidence), and 'There was no evidence to support a dose-response association with higher volumes of muscle-strengthening activities.' 'MVPA bouts of any duration now count towards these recommendations, reflecting new evidence to support the value of total physical activity volume, regardless of bout length.' There is moderate-certainty evidence of a curvilinear dose-response for all-cause and CVD mortality and incident cancer and diabetes: 'More physical activity is better, although the relative benefits tend to diminish at higher levels of physical activity. However, it is not possible to specify the physical activity levels where diminishing returns begin.' Hence the recommendation that more than 300 min moderate (or 150 min vigorous) a week has additional health benefits is rated conditional. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955
- Riebe, D., Franklin, B. A., Thompson, P. D., Garber, C. E., Whitfield, G. P., Magal, M., & Pescatello, L. S. (2015). Updating ACSM's recommendations for exercise preparticipation health screening. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 47(11), 2473-2479. ACSM roundtable: 'there is considerable evidence that exercise is safe for most people and has many associated health and fitness benefits; exercise-related cardiovascular events are often preceded by warning signs/symptoms; and the cardiovascular risks associated with exercise lessen as individuals become more physically active/fit.' The new screening model rests on current activity level, the presence of signs or symptoms or known cardiovascular, metabolic or renal disease, and the desired exercise intensity (abstract, PMID 26473759). 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000664
- NHS. (2026). Fainting (page last reviewed 17 August 2026). Fainting is when you pass out for a short time; it is not usually serious, but anyone who has fainted should see a GP to find out what might have caused it. Causes can include standing up too quickly (which could be a sign of low blood pressure), not eating or drinking enough, being too hot, being very upset or in severe pain, heart problems, and taking drugs or drinking too much alcohol. Call 999 if someone is not breathing, cannot be woken up within 1 minute, has not fully recovered or has difficulty with speech or movement, has chest pain or a pounding, fluttering or irregular heartbeat (palpitations), has seriously hurt themselves before or after fainting, is shaking or jerking (a seizure), fainted while exercising, or fainted while lying down; do not drive yourself to A&E. If you feel about to faint: lie down with your legs raised, or if you cannot, sit with your head lowered between your knees; drink some water; cross your legs while standing up or rock up and down on your toes; clench your fists. If you see someone faint: check whether they respond by gently shaking their shoulders and asking loudly; if not, shout for help and tilt back the head and lift the chin; listen for breathing for at least 10 seconds; if they are breathing normally, lay them on their back and raise their legs (on their side if pregnant, especially over 28 weeks); they usually wake up within 30 seconds. www.nhs.uk/conditions/fainting
- Pescatello, L. S., Franklin, B. A., Fagard, R., Farquhar, W. B., Kelley, G. A., & Ray, C. A. (2004). American College of Sports Medicine position stand: Exercise and hypertension. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36(3), 533-553. Documents post-exercise hypotension persisting ~22 h after a single moderate-intensity session; recommends timing training to coincide with morning BP peak. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000115224.88514.3A
- Murphy, M. H., Lahart, I., Carlin, A., & Murtagh, E. (2019). The effects of continuous compared to accumulated exercise on health: a meta-analytic review. Sports Medicine, 49(10), 1585-1607. 19 studies, 1,080 adults, comparing a single bout of exercise with the same total duration, mode and intensity accumulated in multiple shorter bouts over the day. There were no differences between accumulated and continuous groups for any cardiorespiratory fitness or blood pressure outcome; body mass change favored accumulated exercise (MD -0.92 kg, five studies) and LDL cholesterol fell more with accumulated exercise in two small studies. Conclusion: 'There is no difference between continuous and accumulated patterns of exercise in terms of effects on fitness, blood pressure, lipids, insulin and glucose'; 'adults are likely to accrue similar health benefits from exercising in a single bout or accumulating activity from shorter bouts throughout the day' (abstract, PMID 31267483). 10.1007/s40279-019-01145-2
- Arem, H., Moore, S. C., Patel, A., Hartge, P., Berrington de Gonzalez, A., Visvanathan, K., et al. (2015). Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175(6), 959-967. Pooled analysis of 6 prospective cohorts (661,137 adults, median follow-up 14.2 years, self-reported leisure-time activity). Compared with no leisure-time activity: 20% lower mortality below the recommended minimum (HR 0.80), 31% lower at 1 to 2 times the minimum (HR 0.69), 37% lower at 2 to 3 times (HR 0.63); 'An upper threshold for mortality benefit occurred at 3 to 5 times the physical activity recommendation (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.59-0.62]); however, compared with the recommended minimum, the additional benefit was modest (31% vs 39%). There was no evidence of harm at 10 or more times the recommended minimum (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.59-0.78]).' Conclusion: meeting the minimum 'was associated with nearly the maximum longevity benefit'; health professionals 'do not need to discourage adults who already participate in high-activity levels.' Observational associations (abstract, PMID 25844730). 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533
- Schoenfeld, B. J., Grgic, J., Van Every, D. W., & Plotkin, D. L. (2021). Loading recommendations for muscle strength, hypertrophy, and local endurance: a re-examination of the repetition continuum. Sports, 9(2), 32. Synthesises the modern view that hypertrophy is roughly equivalent across a wide load range (≈30-85% 1RM / 6-30 reps) provided sets are taken close to failure; load specificity matters most for maximal strength. 10.3390/sports9020032
- Kikuchi, N., & Nakazato, K. (2017). Low-load bench press and push-up induce similar muscle hypertrophy and strength gain. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness, 15(1), 37-42. 18 young men were randomly assigned to bench press at 40% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) or to push-ups with the body position adjusted (e.g. kneeling) to the same load, twice a week for 8 weeks. Both groups increased bench-press 1RM and triceps and pectoralis major thickness; biceps thickness increased only with the bench press. Conclusion: 'Push-up exercise with similar load to 40%1RM bench press is comparably effective for muscle hypertrophy and strength gain over an 8-week training period' (abstract, PMID 29541130). 10.1016/j.jesf.2017.06.003
- Coffey, V. G., & Hawley, J. A. (2007). The molecular bases of training adaptation. Sports Medicine, 37(9), 737-763. 'The functional consequences of these adaptations are determined by training volume, intensity and frequency, and the half-life of the protein. Moreover, many features of the training adaptation are specific to the type of stimulus, such as the mode of exercise.' Prolonged endurance training elicits mitochondrial biogenesis, fast-to-slow fibre-type transformation and changes in substrate metabolism; heavy resistance exercise stimulates synthesis of contractile proteins responsible for hypertrophy and increased maximal force; the genetic and molecular mechanisms of the two are distinct. The authors add that it cannot yet be claimed that this molecular work has influenced the training practices of elite athletes (abstract, PMID 17722947). 10.2165/00007256-200737090-00001
- Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., & Sayer, A. A. (2019). Sarcopenia. The Lancet, 393(10191), 2636-2646. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31138-9
- Momma, H., Kawakami, R., Honda, T., & Sawada, S. S. (2022). Muscle-strengthening activities are associated with lower risk and mortality in major non-communicable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 56(13), 755-763. 16 prospective cohort studies of adults without severe health conditions. Muscle-strengthening activities were associated with a 10-17% lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, total cancer, diabetes and lung cancer, independent of aerobic activity, with J-shaped associations and the maximum risk reduction at about 30-60 min a week for all-cause mortality, CVD and total cancer. 'Combined muscle-strengthening and aerobic activities (versus none) were associated with a lower risk of all-cause, CVD and total cancer mortality.' Conclusion: muscle-strengthening activities were inversely associated with the risk of all-cause mortality and major non-communicable diseases; 'however, the influence of a higher volume of muscle-strengthening activities on all-cause mortality, CVD and total cancer is unclear when considering the observed J-shaped associations.' Observational (abstract, PMID 35228201). 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105061
- Reed, J. L., & Pipe, A. L. (2014). The talk test: a useful tool for prescribing and monitoring exercise intensity. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 29(5), 475-480. 'In healthy adults and patients with cardiovascular disease, comfortable speech is likely possible (equivocal or last positive talk test stage) when exercise intensity is below the ventilatory or lactate threshold, and not likely possible (negative talk test stage) when exercise intensity exceeds the ventilatory or lactate threshold.' The talk test has been consistent across walking, jogging, cycling, elliptical trainer and stair stepper, and may not be practical for high-intensity interval training. Summary: it 'is a valid, reliable, practical and inexpensive tool for prescribing and monitoring exercise intensity in competitive athletes, healthy active adults and patients with cardiovascular disease' (abstract, PMID 25010379). 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000097
- Scherr, J., Wolfarth, B., Christle, J. W., Pressler, A., Wagenpfeil, S., & Halle, M. (2013). Associations between Borg's rating of perceived exertion and physiological measures of exercise intensity. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(1), 147-155. 2,560 men and women (median age 28 years) completed incremental treadmill or cycle tests, with heart rate, blood lactate and rating of perceived exertion (RPE, Borg 6-20 scale) measured at the end of each stage. RPE was strongly correlated with heart rate (r = 0.74) and blood lactate (r = 0.83); the lactate threshold and the individual anaerobic threshold corresponded to an RPE of 10.8 ± 1.8 and 13.6 ± 1.8. Sex, age, coronary artery disease, physical activity status and testing modality did not significantly influence the association. Conclusion: Borg's RPE 'seems to be an affordable, practical and valid tool for monitoring and prescribing exercise intensity'; an RPE of 11-13 is recommended for less trained individuals, and 13-15 when more intense but still aerobic training is desired (abstract, PMID 22615009). 10.1007/s00421-012-2421-x
- Tanaka, H., Monahan, K. D., & Seals, D. R. (2001). Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 37(1), 153-156. Reanalysis of 351 studies (n=18,712) yields HRmax = 208 − 0.7×age, more accurate than the legacy 220 − age formula (which carries ±10-12 bpm individual error). 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01054-8
- NHS. (2026). Heart attack: symptoms. Symptoms can include chest pain that may feel like crushing or squeezing on the chest and may spread to the arm, neck and jaw; feeling short of breath; feeling or being sick; feeling like indigestion; sweating; and pale, blue or grey skin. Call 999 for chest pain that feels tight or like squeezing, or that spreads to the arms, neck or jaw, with severe difficulty breathing, or if someone becomes unresponsive. A heart attack needs emergency treatment in hospital (page last reviewed 31 March 2026). www.nhs.uk/conditions/heart-attack/symptoms
- Cheung, K., Hume, P. A., & Maxwell, L. (2003). Delayed onset muscle soreness: treatment strategies and performance factors. Sports Medicine, 33(2), 145-164. 10.2165/00007256-200333020-00005