Story
How Pain Is Made · a decision, not a readout
Last updated
In one pass The pain you feel is a conclusion your nervous system computes, not a reading sent straight up from the wound.
Educational content, not medical advice — consult a clinician.
Story path
Chapter 1
Pain is the brain's conclusion
The pain you feel is a conclusion your nervous system computes, not a reading sent straight up from the wound. Take a knock during a ball game and it may not hurt at the time; it starts to hurt when you get home and see the bruise. The damage happened at the moment of impact, yet the pain arrived two hours late.
On its way from the injury to your awareness, the signal does not travel a direct phone line. It travels a road with several checkpoints, and each one can let it through, hold it back, amplify it or damp it. When the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) revised its definition of pain, the key lay in a few words: pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage (Raja 2020). Or resembling is a formal admission that pain can exist without damage — and that it is still real pain.
The flip side: because how much something hurts is not a readout of how dangerous it is, pain intensity alone cannot tell you whether to seek care. A pain unlike any you have had, peaking within seconds; a crushing pain in the chest; or back pain with numbness around the genitals and anus, or loss of bladder or bowel control — go to the emergency department now. The full red-flag list is in the chapter on what this means in practice.
On its way from the injury to your awareness, the signal does not travel a direct phone line. It travels a road with several checkpoints, and each one can let it through, hold it back, amplify it or damp it. When the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) revised its definition of pain, the key lay in a few words: pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage (Raja 2020). Or resembling is a formal admission that pain can exist without damage — and that it is still real pain.
The flip side: because how much something hurts is not a readout of how dangerous it is, pain intensity alone cannot tell you whether to seek care. A pain unlike any you have had, peaking within seconds; a crushing pain in the chest; or back pain with numbness around the genitals and anus, or loss of bladder or bowel control — go to the emergency department now. The full red-flag list is in the chapter on what this means in practice.
Mechanism · Detection and experience are two things
Go back to that knock on the court. It leaves a large bruise down your shin, you feel almost nothing at the time, and you finish the game; only when you sit down at home does it start to hurt, and it hurts more the longer you sit. If pain were a readout of damage, this would make no sense: tissue tears worst in the second of impact, so that second should hurt most. Yet the same injury gives you completely different pain on the court and on the sofa. Nothing changed in between except how your nervous system handled it. What reaches your awareness is the result of all the adding and subtracting along the way.Two words are often treated as one, and separating them clears up a lot of confusion.
Nociception: a nerve ending detected a noxious stimulus and fired. This is measurable in you.Pain: your experience.
When the IASP revised its definition it attached a note precisely on this: neither implies the other (Raja 2020). Nerves can fire while you feel nothing — that's the two hours on the court. And you can hurt, genuinely, with nothing firing at the periphery.
The distinction matters because it closes off one very damaging sentence. Someone hurts, the work-up finds no matching damage, and the conclusion becomes the pain must be fake. That sentence is physiologically wrong. It treats nociception as pain's entry ticket, and it never was one.
Every checkpoint on this road can pull the two apart: the detecting fibers at the outer edge, the gate in the spinal cord, the regulating line that reaches down from the brainstem, and gain that has been turned up.
Chapter 2
Nerve endings only report trouble
You have no pain receptors. What you have are nociceptors — nerve endings that detect harmful stimuli — and they report trouble, not pain. These free nerve endings sit in skin, muscle, joint capsule and the lining of bone, and the channels in their membranes are normally shut. A high enough temperature, a hard enough squeeze, or chemicals released by damaged tissue open those channels, and only then does the fiber start firing (Basbaum 2009).
What it sends up is a train of pulses encoding how strong and where; nowhere in it is the word pain. Two kinds of fiber make the run: Aδ fibers, wrapped in thin myelin and fast, and C fibers, unwrapped and slow. That is why stubbing a toe on a table leg hurts sharply first and dully after: one impact, two waves of pain.
What this means for you: the outermost layer only raises the alarm. How loud the alarm gets, and whether it counts as pain, is decided at the checkpoints further on. And its own threshold can change too — where tissue is injured, the threshold is turned down.
What it sends up is a train of pulses encoding how strong and where; nowhere in it is the word pain. Two kinds of fiber make the run: Aδ fibers, wrapped in thin myelin and fast, and C fibers, unwrapped and slow. That is why stubbing a toe on a table leg hurts sharply first and dully after: one impact, two waves of pain.
What this means for you: the outermost layer only raises the alarm. How loud the alarm gets, and whether it counts as pain, is decided at the checkpoints further on. And its own threshold can change too — where tissue is injured, the threshold is turned down.
Mechanism · Why this is not a pain nerve
Scattered through skin, muscle, joint capsule and the lining of bone is a class of nerve ending that is bare — not wrapped into a corpuscle. They're called free nerve endings. Their membranes carry channels that normally sit shut. Meet a high enough temperature, a hard enough squeeze, or the chemicals released by damaged tissue, and the channels open, positive ions pour into the fiber, the voltage crosses a threshold, and the fiber starts firing (Basbaum 2009).Notice what it sends up: a train of pulses encoding how strong and where. That's all. Nowhere in that train is the word pain — pain gets computed several stops later.
Two kinds of fiber run this route, differing in whether they're wrapped in myelin:
Aδ fibers: wrapped in a thin myelin sheath. Myelin insulates, letting the signal jump along, so it's fast. This gives you the fast, sharp, well-localized hit.C fibers: no myelin, so the signal crawls segment by segment, more than ten times slower. This gives you the slow, dull, hard-to-place ache.
This explains something you verify constantly. Catch your toe on a table leg and there's a sharp yelp of pain, then about a second later a dull, swelling ache floods in. One impact, two waves of pain — because the fast line and the slow line don't arrive together (Basbaum 2009).
Calling these fibers pain nerves sounds harmless and is actually the root of the whole misunderstanding.
The name smuggles in an assumption: this line fires, therefore pain. From which it follows neatly — the worse it hurts, the harder the line is firing, the worse the damage.
But the line does exactly one job: detect a mechanical, thermal or chemical stimulus above threshold, and fire. It doesn't know whether you're on the court or the sofa, whether the injury matters, or whether you hurt. It's an alarm contact, not a pain meter.
Worse, the threshold isn't fixed. Chemicals released by damaged tissue lower the threshold of nearby nociceptors, so stimuli that wouldn't normally qualify can set them off (Basbaum 2009). That's why warm water stings on sunburn — the water didn't get hotter, that patch's threshold got turned down. This is peripheral sensitization.
Remember what the word means: sensitization is a threshold turned down. The same thing can happen in the spinal cord, with far heavier consequences — that is central sensitization, the explanation for pain that outlasts a healed injury.
Chapter 3
How the spinal cord filters signals
After a knock you rub the spot without thinking. That is not psychological comfort; you are closing a real gate by hand. The Aδ and C fibers coming from the skin first enter a block of gray matter at the back of the spinal cord (the dorsal horn) and change connections there. The same dorsal horn also receives Aβ, the thick fibers that carry touch and pressure.
Melzack and Wall proposed in 1965 that activity in the thick fibers presses down on the route by which the thin fibers send signals upward, and whichever side prevails sets how far the gate opens (Melzack 1965). Rubbing floods that gate with Aβ input. The gate is not a literal door; it is a set of interneurons doing arithmetic. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, which uses current to rub for you, stands on the same ground.
The specific 1965 wiring was revised a good deal later, but the core has held up: the dorsal horn is an adjustable relay station, not a through-wire. For you, it also explains why the pain comes back the moment your hand stops — the gate depends on ongoing input.
Melzack and Wall proposed in 1965 that activity in the thick fibers presses down on the route by which the thin fibers send signals upward, and whichever side prevails sets how far the gate opens (Melzack 1965). Rubbing floods that gate with Aβ input. The gate is not a literal door; it is a set of interneurons doing arithmetic. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, which uses current to rub for you, stands on the same ground.
The specific 1965 wiring was revised a good deal later, but the core has held up: the dorsal horn is an adjustable relay station, not a through-wire. For you, it also explains why the pain comes back the moment your hand stops — the gate depends on ongoing input.
Mechanism · Why rubbing only helps for a moment
The Aδ and C fibers coming from skin don't connect straight to the brain. They enter the spinal cord first and change connections in a block of gray matter at the back, the dorsal horn. Wherever a signal changes hands, it can be tampered with.The key point: that same dorsal horn also receives another input, the Aβ fibers. These are the thick, heavily myelinated, fastest-conducting class, and they carry touch, pressure and vibration — rubbing, stroking, pressing and holding all activate them.
Melzack and Wall proposed in 1965 that the two inputs compete in the dorsal horn. Activity in the thick Aβ fibers, working through a set of interneurons, presses down on the thin fibers' route upward; activity in the thin fibers lifts that suppression. Whichever input prevails sets how far the gate opens, and so how much signal travels on (Melzack 1965).
So rubbing genuinely works: you are flooding the gate with Aβ input and crowding the thin-fiber route out. Anyone can verify it; no trust required.
The metaphor stops here: the gate isn't a door, with no hinge and no switch. It's a set of interneurons doing arithmetic, and the arithmetic decides how much goes up. This is also what transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation stands on — using current to rub for you.
The specific 1965 wiring diagram was substantially revised later, and that should be said plainly. But the core has held: the dorsal horn is an adjustable relay, not a through-wire.
Rubbing helps — and you'll have noticed it stops helping the moment your hand stops.
That is exactly what the mechanism predicts. The gate is held shut by ongoing Aβ input, not flipped to a setting and locked. Stop your hand, Aβ stops firing, the suppression lifts, and the thin-fiber route takes the lead again.
This yields a transferable judgment: anything that works by pressing the gate shut with external input can only work while the input continues. Rubbing, vibration devices, electrical stimulation pads, massage guns — all of them are this category. They aren't frauds; the gate is real and the suppression is real. But if someone tells you such a device cures something, or opens or reconnects anything, that claim has run past what the mechanism can support.
What they can do is clear and genuinely valuable: buy you a window that hurts less. The most practical use of that window is to bring activity back, gradually, while the pain is lower.
Chapter 4
The brainstem turns pain up or down
The brainstem runs a line straight down onto the spinal cord's gate, and those two painless hours on the court were its work. It starts in the midbrain's periaqueductal gray, connects to the medulla, and descends all the way to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (Ossipov 2010).
This line is not a dial that only turns down. The relay in the medulla holds two kinds of cells: one suppresses pain and the other amplifies it. So one pathway can both relieve and promote pain, and which kind wins depends on the situation, attention and mood of the moment. Among the messengers it uses are the body's own opioids; morphine relieves pain largely by riding this same line.
In a classic experiment after wisdom-tooth extraction, the pain relief brought by a placebo was canceled by naloxone, a drug that blocks opioid receptors (Levine 1978). At least that portion of placebo relief is not pretending; it runs on a real neural pathway. For you, this means an injury that hurts more on some days and less on others does not make the pain fake.
This line is not a dial that only turns down. The relay in the medulla holds two kinds of cells: one suppresses pain and the other amplifies it. So one pathway can both relieve and promote pain, and which kind wins depends on the situation, attention and mood of the moment. Among the messengers it uses are the body's own opioids; morphine relieves pain largely by riding this same line.
In a classic experiment after wisdom-tooth extraction, the pain relief brought by a placebo was canceled by naloxone, a drug that blocks opioid receptors (Levine 1978). At least that portion of placebo relief is not pretending; it runs on a real neural pathway. For you, this means an injury that hurts more on some days and less on others does not make the pain fake.
Mechanism · Why the same injury hurts more or less
The route: in the midbrain sits a cuff of gray matter wrapped around the cerebrospinal fluid channel, the periaqueductal gray. It projects down to a region of the medulla, which sends fibers the rest of the way to the dorsal horn — landing exactly on the gate that rubbing can close (Ossipov 2010). So information doesn't only travel up. The top reaches down and rewrites the checkpoint's settings directly.That medullary relay holds two cell types with opposite jobs: when one fires, pain relayed by the dorsal horn is suppressed; when the other fires, pain is amplified (Ossipov 2010). One pathway, both analgesic and pro-nociceptive. Which type prevails depends on the situation, attention, expectation and mood of the moment.
Among the messengers this line uses are the body's own opioids, and the periaqueductal gray is dense with the receptors that catch them. Morphine relieves pain largely by hitching a ride on this existing system.
Which sets up a beautiful experiment. Give people who've just had wisdom teeth out a placebo, and some of them genuinely hurt less. Now give those responders naloxone — a drug that blocks opioid receptors — and their pain comes back; give it to the people who didn't respond to placebo in the first place, and it changes nothing (Levine 1978).
It was a small, classic experiment, but its conclusion carries weight: at least this part of placebo analgesia is not people pretending. It runs on the body's own opioid pathway — a real anatomical circuit that a drug can block. Anything reversible by naloxone cannot be living only in the imagination.
The same injury hurts more after a bad night, less when you're distracted, and worse the more you fear it. These get filed under psychological and then dismissed.
Mechanistically they aren't in the psychological column at all. They're in the anatomical one. Attention, expectation, mood and stress state all feed into that descending line from the periaqueductal gray, and that line ends physically on the dorsal horn (Ossipov 2010).
So relax and it'll hurt less and the pain is psychological are entirely different sentences, and the difference is worth nailing down:
The first says: there is a real neural pathway through which context can change the gate's setting.The second says: your pain doesn't exist.
The first has anatomy behind it. The second has nothing behind it — pain needs no nociceptive entry ticket; it is an experience that can stand on its own.
This also puts sleep and stress back where they belong. They aren't soft advice. They are adjustments to this line's operating point.
Chapter 5
Why pain outlasts the injury
After being fired at again and again, the dorsal horn of the spinal cord itself becomes easier to fire — which can explain why pain outlasts a healed injury. When C fibers keep delivering input to the dorsal horn, the junctions there are rebuilt: synaptic transmission gets more efficient and the neurons get more excitable. This process is called central sensitization (Woolf 2011).
After the rebuild, the threshold is lower, each neuron responds to a wider patch of skin, and the same input sends a stronger signal onward. What you feel is hyperalgesia (what already hurt now hurts more) and allodynia (what never hurt now does — clothing brushing past, warm water running over the skin). When the wound heals, this gain does not automatically come back down.
Central sensitization does not mean the pain is psychological: a change in synaptic efficiency is a physical change that can be measured in experiments. And its definition carries one word built in — reversible.
After the rebuild, the threshold is lower, each neuron responds to a wider patch of skin, and the same input sends a stronger signal onward. What you feel is hyperalgesia (what already hurt now hurts more) and allodynia (what never hurt now does — clothing brushing past, warm water running over the skin). When the wound heals, this gain does not automatically come back down.
Central sensitization does not mean the pain is psychological: a change in synaptic efficiency is a physical change that can be measured in experiments. And its definition carries one word built in — reversible.
Mechanism · Can central sensitization be undone?
Damaged tissue turns thresholds down at the periphery; that is peripheral sensitization. The same thing happens inside the spinal cord, and far more consequentially.When C fibers deliver input to the dorsal horn over and over, the junction gets rebuilt on the dorsal-horn neuron's side: synaptic transmission is turned up, and the neuron's excitability is turned up. This process is central sensitization (Woolf 2011). Three consequences follow the rebuild:
The threshold drops: inputs that wouldn't have qualified now make it fire.The receptive field widens: a neuron that used to watch one small patch of skin can now be activated from the patch next door. So pain spreads into uninjured territory.It amplifies: the same input strength sends a stronger signal onward.
At the level you can actually feel, that becomes two named things:
Hyperalgesia: what hurt already now hurts more.Allodynia: what never hurt at all — clothing brushing past, warm water, the weight of a duvet — now hurts (Woolf 2011).
Put the three together and the counterintuitive thing follows: when the wound heals, the gain does not automatically come back down. The tissue has finished repairing while the amplifier is still set where it was. Your pain then isn't because something is still breaking there; it's because the gain along this route was changed.
One thing must be nailed shut here, or the whole story gets read backwards. Central sensitization is not the pain being psychological, and not the pain being imagined. A change in synaptic transmission is a physical change, measurable in an experiment (Woolf 2011). Saying someone's pain is amplified by central sensitization and saying they're faking are sentences pointing in opposite directions — the first says their nervous system genuinely changed.
That sounds like a verdict. It isn't.
Woolf's own definition of central sensitization is carefully worded: a prolonged but reversible increase in the excitability and synaptic efficacy of neurons in central nociceptive pathways (Woolf 2011). Reversible is built into the definition, not offered as consolation.
What can be built up can be taken down. That's why this mechanism doesn't lead to despair; it leads to a few rather plain things: gradual activity that allows a little pain, sleep, stress. The mechanism predicts that these act on exactly these settings, but how far each one turns sensitization back in a given person has not been measured directly.
An honest boundary too, or the idea gets misused. Central sensitization explains that pain can exist apart from damage. It does not prove that any particular person has no damage. Those are very different claims. Someone can have both a real tissue problem and a turned-up gain; in fact that's common. Working out which applies to one individual is a job for a doctor in the room, not something an explainer can do for you.
This story gives you the why, not the which one are you.
Chapter 6
What this means in practice
Put the checkpoints along this road together and three things come out ready to use.
First, degeneration on a scan is neither necessary nor sufficient for pain: the gate, the descending line and the gain are all invisible on a scan. Second, pain intensity is adjusted along the way, so the rule pain means stop has no physiological basis; in chronic musculoskeletal pain, exercise programs that allow some pain do no worse than programs that demand no pain at all. Third, understanding that pain can exist apart from damage does not mean you can skip the doctor. Precisely because pain is not a readout of danger, red flags have to be screened by the signals that come with it: a sudden, explosive severe pain, a crushing chest pain, numbness around the genitals and anus, or loss of bladder or bowel control all mean go to the emergency department now.
First, degeneration on a scan is neither necessary nor sufficient for pain: the gate, the descending line and the gain are all invisible on a scan. Second, pain intensity is adjusted along the way, so the rule pain means stop has no physiological basis; in chronic musculoskeletal pain, exercise programs that allow some pain do no worse than programs that demand no pain at all. Third, understanding that pain can exist apart from damage does not mean you can skip the doctor. Precisely because pain is not a readout of danger, red flags have to be screened by the signals that come with it: a sudden, explosive severe pain, a crushing chest pain, numbness around the genitals and anus, or loss of bladder or bowel control all mean go to the emergency department now.
In practice · Scans, movement and when to seek care
1 · The degeneration on a scan can't, on its own, explain why you hurtThis conclusion needs the anatomy and the population data together; neither half carries it alone.
Pain needs two things: a nociceptive fiber that has been set off, plus a gate willing to let it through.
In a healthy disc, only the outer third of the annulus is innervated; the water-rich nucleus at the center has essentially no blood vessels and no nerve endings (Hartvigsen 2018 · Freemont 1997). Which sounds like it settles it: no alarm fitted, nothing rings when it breaks.
But a degenerated disc grows nerves into itself. In a study that took samples during spinal fusion surgery in people with chronic back pain, 57% of samples from the painful level had nerves growing into the inner annulus or the nucleus — and so did 25% from neighboring levels that did not hurt (Freemont 1997). So the premise fails at exactly the step that needed it: you cannot argue from it never had an alarm to the conclusion that an already degenerated disc can't hurt.
Add the stops downstream: how much you hurt depends on how the gate is set, where the descending line is dialled, and whether the gain has been altered. Not one of those settings is visible on a scan.
So what survives is the weaker — and more useful — claim: degeneration on a scan is neither necessary nor sufficient for your pain. The population data says both halves: degeneration is extremely common in people with no symptoms (Brinjikji 2015), and yet the same authors' other found that in people under fifty, findings like disc bulge and extrusion genuinely are more common in those with back pain (Brinjikji 2015). Both are true. Together they don't mean pain comes from somewhere else — they mean that scan can't answer, on its own, why you hurt.
2 · Pain doesn't mean you're being damaged — which is why you can move
Since pain intensity is a modulated quantity, the rule pain means stop has no physiological basis. This is exactly where progressive loading stands: in chronic musculoskeletal pain, exercise protocols that permit pain do at least as well as protocols demanding pain-free movement, and slightly better in the short term (Smith 2017).
In practice, read pain as a signal rather than a prohibition:
A bit sore, not steadily worsening, back to baseline the next day → usually fine to continue.Worse every session, clearly worse the following day, each time worse than the last → scale back.
3 · Red flags still need a doctor — and the reason is inside this mechanism
This has to be said out loud: understanding that pain can exist apart from damage does not mean you can skip the doctor.
Quite the opposite. This story argues one thing from beginning to end — pain intensity is adjusted by the gate and the descending line, so it was never a readout of danger. Which means using how much it hurts to decide whether to seek care is the wrong instrument from the start. Danger is screened by the accompanying signals.
But one exception comes first, because it is the mirror image of the judgment above: the way a pain arrives is itself an accompanying signal. Sudden onset, peaking within seconds, and the worst of your life — those three together are an emergency wherever it hurts. The don't-judge-by-how-badly-it-hurts rule is about chronic, recurring pain. A pain that has never happened before and detonates is a different thing entirely.
The mechanism in this story explains away none of the following:
Emergency department now, head: a thunderclap headache peaking within seconds, especially the worst of your life. Could be a subarachnoid hemorrhage.Emergency department now, chest: crushing or pressing, like a stone on you, radiating to jaw, left shoulder or left arm; or a tearing pain. Could be acute coronary syndrome or aortic dissection.Emergency department now, abdomen: sudden severe abdominal pain, especially with a rigid abdomen, fever, vomiting, or signs of shock.Emergency department now, low back: numbness around the perineum, anus or inner thighs (saddle anesthesia); sudden inability to pass urine or to hold it; bowel incontinence; progressive weakness in both legs at once. This is cauda equina syndrome, and a delay of hours can be irreversible.See a doctor promptly: progressive neurological deficit (steadily weaker, an enlarging area of numbness, foot drop).See a doctor promptly: unexplained weight loss, or a history of cancer with new pain, especially pain that wakes you at night and doesn't ease with rest.See a doctor promptly: fever or chills alongside the pain.See a doctor promptly: severe pain after significant trauma (a fall, a crash, an impact).
This site offers general education and explanation. It does not replace a physician's diagnosis and treatment, and it prescribes no specific treatment. For pain carrying the red flags above, or pain that keeps worsening, see a doctor in person as soon as you can.
The other half of point 1 is population data, and here are its numbers.
A systematic review pooling imaging from large populations with no back pain at all found disc degeneration in about a third of asymptomatic 20-year-olds, approaching universal by 80; disc bulges in around 30% at 20 and over 80% by 80 (Brinjikji 2015). None of these people hurt.
In other words, pull a random symptom-free middle-aged person into a scanner and you will likely image an abnormality or two. That fits the judgment above: many of the changes on a scan are common, age-related changes in structure, and on their own they cannot answer why you hurt.
It's also why mainstream guidelines don't recommend routine imaging for ordinary back pain without red flags (NICE NG59). The Lancet Low Back Pain series puts it more bluntly: the world's response to back pain is frequently too aggressive — over-imaging, over-injecting, over-operating — while the explanation and activity most worth giving are under-supplied (Foster 2018).
This story doesn't teach you what to do about your body part. That's the division of labor: the low back pain, neck pain, knee pain and sedentary-body stories each handle their own region. This one only explains why the line they all share — pain is not damage — is true in the first place.
brinjikji-2015-ajnr-imagingfoster-2018-lancet-lbpfreemont-1997-disc-nerve-ingrowthbrinjikji-2015-degeneration-vs-lbp
References · 9
- Raja, S. N., Carr, D. B., Cohen, M., Finnerup, N. B., Flor, H., Gibson, S., Keefe, F. J., Mogil, J. S., Ringkamp, M., Sluka, K. A., Song, X.-J., Stevens, B., Sullivan, M. D., Tutelman, P. R., Ushida, T., & Vader, K. (2020). The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain, 161(9), 1976-1982. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939
- Basbaum, A. I., Bautista, D. M., Scherrer, G., & Julius, D. (2009). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell, 139(2), 267-284. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.028
- Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965). Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science, 150(3699), 971-979. 10.1126/science.150.3699.971
- Ossipov, M. H., Dussor, G. O., & Porreca, F. (2010). Central modulation of pain. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 120(11), 3779-3787. 10.1172/JCI43766
- Levine, J. D., Gordon, N. C., & Fields, H. L. (1978). The mechanism of placebo analgesia. Lancet, 2(8091), 654-657. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/80579
- Woolf, C. J. (2011). Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain, 152(3 Suppl), S2-S15. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030
- Hartvigsen, J., Hancock, M. J., Kongsted, A., Louw, Q., Ferreira, M. L., Genevay, S., et al. (2018). What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. The Lancet, 391(10137), 2356-2367. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X
- Smith, B. E., Hendrick, P., Smith, T. O., Bateman, M., Moffatt, F., Rathleff, M. S., Selfe, J., & Logan, P. (2017). Should exercises be painful in the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(23), 1679-1687. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097383
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2016, updated 2020). Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management (NICE guideline NG59). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59