跳到主内容Skip to content
Debunking Matrix
The claimEvidence A · guideline-tier

Alternate-day fasting beats standard calorie restriction

The evidence

Over 12 months, alternate-day fasting lost about the same weight as standard calorie restriction (−6.0% vs −5.3%, not a significant difference), but people stuck to it less well and the risk of a binge cycle was higher (Trepanowski 2017, JAMA Internal Medicine).

The mechanism, in brief

Weight is a metabolic question, not an aesthetic one. What matters is not just the number on the scale but where the fat sits. At the same weight, fat wrapped around the organs (the liver, pancreas and intestines) causes far more trouble than fat under the skin: it is linked to insulin working less well, higher…

Sources (1)
  • The Global BMI Mortality Collaboration. (2016). Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: Individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. The Lancet, 388(10046), 776–786. IPD from 239 prospective studies (10.6 million people); primary analyses in 3.95 million never-smokers without chronic disease who survived 5 years. All-cause mortality lowest at BMI 20.0-25.0; HR 1.13 at 18.5-20, 1.51 at 15-18.5, 1.07 at 25-27.5, 1.20 at 27.5-30, 1.45 at 30-35, 1.94 at 35-40, 2.76 at 40-60; per 5 units above 25, HR 1.39 in Europe and east Asia, 1.29 North America, 1.31 Australia/NZ; stronger in younger people and men (abstract, PMID 27423262).
Go deeperRead the full mechanism →

Related debunks