About · Finuwell
About this site
Finuwell is a visual atlas of how your body works. The reason we built it is plain — there is no shortage of health information online, but there is a shortage of the kind that explains the actual mechanism. The fragmented stuff makes people anxious; the heavy textbooks turn them away. We aim for the layer in between.
Our promise is one line: know what is true, and know why it is true. Every recommendation, every dose, every mechanism diagram comes with citations and an evidence grade. We don't make decisions for you — we lay out the knowledge you need, once, clearly.
Method
- · Every number and mechanism claim has at least one source (DRI / EFSA / review / textbook).
- · Evidence strength is graded A / B / C / expert-consensus; C-grade claims are flagged “limited evidence.”
- · The health report runs on an explicit rule engine — no AI model infers anything about your input.
- · Health-report input stays in your browser by default. It is uploaded — encrypted, to your account — only if you tick “save this report”.
- · The assistant is the exception: your question is sent to a third-party model provider to generate an answer. The privacy policy names every provider and what it handles.
What we don't do
- · No disease diagnosis or prescription advice.
- · No brand recommendations, no ads, no embedded shopping links.
- · No advertising profiles; we never sell or trade your data.
- · No nagging, no popups, no FOMO marketing.
Who writes this, and how we keep it right
This site is written and maintained by an independent developer who is not a practising clinician. Which is exactly why it does not ask you to trust the author. It runs on a process you can check — every line below is enforced automatically, not promised:
- · No claim without a source: every scene carries at least one registered citation, or the build fails.
- · Sources must resolve: every record with a DOI is checked against Crossref. That is how a fabricated reference — wrong author, journal, volume and DOI — was caught.
- · Sources must fit the claim: three further audits hunt for citations that are real but unrelated — years that cannot line up, subjects that do not overlap, studies named in the prose but never attached.
- · Numbers get re-read: the corpus is re-checked against the original papers in batches; confirmed corrections are recorded in a public work log.
- · Every article lists its references with clickable DOIs — you do not have to take our word for it.
None of this replaces clinical judgement, and none of it catches the hardest error — a real paper that simply does not say the thing being claimed. That takes a person reading the original. If you find anything wrong, write to huahaoshang2000@gmail.com; we will correct it and note the change.